In this
900 Global Ember review,
we’ll test how this new pearl ball performs on medium oil and in transition.
You’ll learn how it compares to the Cove, what type of ball motion
it creates, and who it’s best for.
Let’s get into the details.
Please note that some links in this 900 Global Ember review may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps us cover the costs of creating better content for you.

First Impressions
The Ember looks sharp and modern. Its glossy pearl finish hints at speed and
backend motion. In our
900 Global Ember review,
we noticed its stability and power. That’s thanks to the Magna A.I. Core.
This
symmetric core keeps the ball on line. It’s the same core found in the Cove.
The cover, however, is different.
The result? 900 Global Ember shape more in the backend than the Cove.
If you're looking for a bowling ball for transition oil, this is the ball to consider. Check the 900 Global Ember price on Amazon.

Coverstock and Finish
The Ember uses RB82 Reactive Pearl. It’s a high-response pearl cover that skids easily through the front part of the lane.
This cover allows a cleaner look than the Cove. It stores energy and then releases it hard on the backend. In this 900 Global Ember review, we saw a sharper breakpoint and stronger finish.
The ball comes with a Power Edge factory finish. This finish keeps the ball fast and clean through the heads.
Core Dynamics
The Magna A.I. Core is the real star. It’s balanced and stable, yet strong
enough to create shape downlane. In the
900 Global Ember review, we found the core gave the ball predictability and explosive drive.
Even
when we missed a little, the core kept the ball from overreacting.
Lane Performance
We tested the Ember on a fresh house shot and medium oil sport shot. The
900 Global Ember review revealed
consistent length with sharp backend recovery.
On house shots, it
floated through the dry easily. On the sport shot, it needed a bit more
friction to kick in.
This is not a ball for heavy oil. But on
medium oil and during transition, it shines.
How It Compares to the Cove
The Ember is the perfect follow-up to the Cove. When the Cove starts to hook too early, bring out the Ember.
In our 900 Global Ember review, the Cove had more control in the midlane. But
the Ember created more shape and angle downlane.
They share the
same core, so they feel related. But the Ember adds more backend pop.
Who Should Use the Ember?
This ball fits a wide range of players. In the 900 Global Ember review, we
found it best for medium oil conditions.
If you want a smooth start
with an angular finish, it’s for you. It's especially good if you’re
rev-dominant or need a clean motion during transition.
Bowlers who
already love the Cove will like this as their next ball down.

Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Clean through the heads
- trong and angular downlane motion
- Pairs well with Cove for transition play
- Symmetric core feels stable and controllables
Cons:
- Not ideal on heavy oil
- Needs friction to finish properl

Final Thoughts of 900 Global Ember Review
The 900 Global Ember review confirms that this ball brings strong backend
performance in a balanced, readable shape.
It’s ideal when your
stronger ball reads too soon. It helps you stay lined up as lanes break down.
If you bowl on medium oil patterns and want predictability with punch, the
Ember fits your game.